In its suit, BPI sought to convict the defendants in “payment – as contractual damages” of €1.2 million, plus interest (…) “or (…) wrongful enrichment” to recover more than €688 million won by them. He claimed that the 66-year-old doctor “voluntarily breached the duties he was contractually bound to open a bank account”. He stressed that this happened when he “made a sale on the stock exchange that he could not help but know that it was not in his wallet.” He also breached the duty to “inform the bank in error about the status of his account” and refused to rectify it, which caused the bank to be “impoverished”.
BPI is pointing a finger at BNP
According to the Lisbon affair, the BPI says that “BNP Paribas” was to blame for its “operational error”, so the judges advise that you “reason” with your “partner” and not blame the couple, who insist they have done nothing “wrong”.
Rapporteur – Edgar Lopez
TRL rule, which poison Reached, fourth date. Signed by Justices Edgar López (Rapporteur), Luis Felipe Perez de Souza, and Alexandra C. Rocha
defeat
The BPI has also lost its appeal against a clinic where the doctor works, and will have to pay 11,995.20 euro who removed it from the account. In question, the sale was for 195 thousand euroof shares in the same company, which cost 35 thousand euro.
“Writer. Communicator. Award-winning food junkie. Internet ninja. Incurable bacon fanatic.”
More Stories
Norris surprises and achieves his first Formula 1 win at the Miami GP
Peñafiel Maritimo, 0-1: The Islanders continue their fight for promotion to the second division
Rocha apologizes: “I wish I had done more for my team, my friends and Benfica” – Futsal