In its suit, BPI sought to convict the defendants in “payment – as contractual damages” of €1.2 million, plus interest (…) “or (…) wrongful enrichment” to recover more than €688 million won by them. He claimed that the 66-year-old doctor “voluntarily breached the duties he was contractually bound to open a bank account”. He stressed that this happened when he “made a sale on the stock exchange that he could not help but know that it was not in his wallet.” He also breached the duty to “inform the bank in error about the status of his account” and refused to rectify it, which caused the bank to be “impoverished”.
BPI is pointing a finger at BNP
According to the Lisbon affair, the BPI says that “BNP Paribas” was to blame for its “operational error”, so the judges advise that you “reason” with your “partner” and not blame the couple, who insist they have done nothing “wrong”.
Rapporteur – Edgar Lopez
TRL rule, which poison Reached, fourth date. Signed by Justices Edgar López (Rapporteur), Luis Felipe Perez de Souza, and Alexandra C. Rocha
defeat
The BPI has also lost its appeal against a clinic where the doctor works, and will have to pay 11,995.20 euro who removed it from the account. In question, the sale was for 195 thousand euroof shares in the same company, which cost 35 thousand euro.
Melody Gross is a contributor at Brytfmonline.com, covering a wide range of topics including news, politics, business, technology, sports, entertainment, and lifestyle. She is committed to delivering clear, accurate, and reader-focused reporting that helps audiences stay informed about current events and important developments. With a focus on useful information and balanced storytelling, Melody aims to present timely stories and relevant insights in a way that is accessible, engaging, and easy to understand.